Comparative evaluation of Wintrobe method and the automated Alifax® system for Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate determination

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71068/52yb8j78

Keywords:

ESR, Wintrobe, Alifax®, Inflammation

Abstract

The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was a widely used hematological test that served as a nonspecific marker of inflammation. Despite the development of more specific techniques, its simplicity, low cost, and clinical value in the appropriate context maintained its relevance in medical practice. This article addressed the principles, advantages, and technical considerations of two methods used for ESR measurement: the manual Wintrobe method and the automated Alifax® system.

The Wintrobe method, although less sensitive than the Westergren method, allowed ESR determination without sample dilution and with a smaller blood volume, making it useful in low- resource settings or for special populations. In contrast, Alifax® used automated capillary photometry technology, providing results equivalent to the reference method in just 20 seconds, with high reproducibility and operational efficiency.

A key aspect of this study was the discussion of reference values, which should not have been considered interchangeable across methods. While Wintrobe tended to underestimate ESR in cases of active inflammation, Alifax® adopted the reference ranges of the Westergren method, for which it had been calibrated. Therefore, the need to establish and validate method-specific reference values for each population was emphasized.

This study established specific reference intervals for ESR, stratified by sex, age, and analytical method, in accordance with the guidelines of CLSI EP28-A3c. The results showed consistent

 

differences between the manual Wintrobe method and the automated Alifax® system, highlighting the importance of not interpreting their results interchangeably. Thus, it was essential for each laboratory to validate its own reference intervals to ensure accurate and clinically meaningful diagnostic interpretation.

This work underscored the importance of selecting the most appropriate method for each clinical setting, considering both patient characteristics and laboratory capabilities, to ensure proper interpretation and effective integration of ESR in medical decision-making.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alifax S.r.l. (2021). ESR Line – Test1 Brochure. https://www.alifax.com

Bain, B. J. (2017). Blood Cells: A Practical Guide (5th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Biernacki, E. F. (1897). Ueber eine neue Methode zur diagnostischen Beurtheilung des Blutes. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, 23, 769–772.

Brigden, M. L. (1999). Clinical utility of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate. American Family Physician, 60(5), 1443–1450.

Brugnara, C., Schiller, B., & Moran, J. (2014). New techniques for measuring the erythrocyte sedimentation rate. American Journal of Hematology, 89(2), 210–213.

Hunder, G. G., Bloch, D. A., Michel, B. A., Stevens, M. B., Arend, W. P., Calabrese, L. H., ... & Zvaifler, N. J. (1990). The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of giant cell arteritis. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 33(8), 1122–1128.

Kushner, I., Rzewnicki, D., & Samols, D. (2016). What does minor elevation of C- reactive protein signify? The American Journal of Medicine, 119(2), 166.e17–166.e28.

Lewis, S. M., Bain, B. J., & Bates, I. (2012). Dacie and Lewis Practical Haematology

(11th ed.). Elsevier.

Mahajan, V., Walia, R., & Arora, S. (2017). Comparison of Westergren and Wintrobe methods for the estimation of erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 11(4), BC04–BC06.

Piva, E., Hamouda, M., Pelloso, M., & Plebani, M. (2011). Automated measurement of erythrocyte sedimentation rate: comparison of four different systems. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 71(7), 568–573.

Sox, H. C., & Liang, M. H. (1986). The erythrocyte sedimentation rate: guidelines for rational use. Annals of Internal Medicine, 104(4), 515–523.

Westergren, A. (1921). Studien über die Hämoglobinsenkungsgeschwindigkeit des Blutes bei verschiedenen Erkrankungen. Arkiv för Medicin, 16, 1–30.

Smith, J. A., & Patel, R. (2023). Advances in erythrocyte sedimentation rate testing: A comprehensive review. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, 37(2), e24789. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24789

Ahmed, N., & Zhao, Y. (2022). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate: Interpretation in the era of COVID-19 and other systemic inflammatory conditions. International Journal of Laboratory Hematology, 44(3), 349–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.13723

Wu, X., & Zhang, J. (2025). Recent progress in analytical technologies for erythrocyte sedimentation rate and related biomarkers. Analytical Chemistry, 97(4), 2581–2590. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c04751

Damien, E. (2023). Recent advancements in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) analyzers. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, 12(2), 124–130. https://www.longdom.org/open-access/recent-advancements-in-erythrocyte- sedimentation-rate-esr-analyzers.pdf

Hologlu, E. N., Uzunlulu, M., & Torun, C. (2024). Extremely elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rates: associations with patients' diagnoses and clinical characteristics. Romanian Journal of Internal Medicine, 0, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2478/rjim-2024-0034

Red blood cell sedimentation rate measurements in a high aspect ratio microchannel. (2022). Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation, 1(1), 1–10. https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/red-blood-cell-sedimentation-rate- measurements-in-a-high-aspect-r

Downloads

Published

2025-07-26

How to Cite

Ibarra-Sánchez, A. ., Soto-Félix , C. ., Guzmán-Mendoza , A. ., Cano-Barraza , L. ., & Barraza-Sámano , D. . (2025). Comparative evaluation of Wintrobe method and the automated Alifax® system for Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate determination. Multidisciplinary Journal of Sciences, Discoveries, and Society, 2(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.71068/52yb8j78